Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 06:57

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How to reduce your risk of melanoma and other skin cancers - KSLTV.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery - MLB Trade Rumors
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
SpaceX knocks out another national security launch while ULA faces scrutiny - Yahoo
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Common herbal supplement linked to deadly liver disease - Times of India
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
32.4 Patch Notes - Blizzard Entertainment
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What do you do you do if your motorcycle chain snaps while riding on the highway?